<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Assorted Udderances &#187; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.myselfmusic.com/category/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.myselfmusic.com</link>
	<description>take a pull offa Ben&#039;s pipe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:25:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Canada votes in favour of asbestos</title>
		<link>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2011/06/canada-votes-in-favour-of-asbestos/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2011/06/canada-votes-in-favour-of-asbestos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 23:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kennedy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.myselfmusic.com/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CBC reports that "Opposition MPs slammed the Harper government Thursday over Canada's opposition to putting chrysotile asbestos on an international list of hazardous chemicals." It goes on to say that a spokesman for the UN's environment program stated that "David Sproule, the head of Canada's delegation, told participants that «Canada is not in a position [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/story/2011/06/23/pol-asbestos-blocked.html">CBC reports</a> that "Opposition MPs slammed the Harper government Thursday over Canada's opposition to putting chrysotile asbestos on an international list of hazardous chemicals."</p>
<p>It goes on to say that a spokesman for the UN's environment program stated that "David Sproule, the head of Canada's delegation, told participants that «Canada is not in a position to agree to the listing of chrysotile asbestos … at this conference of the parties»".</p>
<p>If accurate, then Sproule's remark is obviously a lie.  By having the capacity to vote, Canada is in a position to agree.  It has simply chosen not to.</p>
<p>The decision is repugnant, and typically illustrative of the Steven Harper government's lack of moral compass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2011/06/canada-votes-in-favour-of-asbestos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ad hoc cop talk (or, how VPD thinks I should ride a bicycle)</title>
		<link>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2011/04/ad-hoc-cop-talk-or-how-vpd-thinks-i-should-ride-a-bicycle/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2011/04/ad-hoc-cop-talk-or-how-vpd-thinks-i-should-ride-a-bicycle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kennedy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[road rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vpd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.myselfmusic.com/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just had a strange encounter with some Vancouver Police on my way in to work this morning. I was riding my bike north on Kingsway, in the right-most lane.  Just north of 12th, while I was riding on the dashed the margin between parked cars and the right-most lane, the car behind behind me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just had a strange encounter with some Vancouver Police on my way in to work this morning.</p>
<p>I was riding my bike north on Kingsway, in the right-most lane.  Just north of 12th, while I was riding on the dashed the margin between parked cars and the right-most lane, the car behind behind me slowed to give me an opportunity to change lanes.  I signalled left, and safely made it into the left lane.  I continued north, across Broadway, then stopped in with the queue of traffic waiting to turn left onto 7th.</p>
<p>At this point two Vancouver Police officers, riding motorcycles two abreast, pulled up to the right of me (in the through lane).  I heard someone shouting "Hello! Hello!", and realized they were trying to get my attention.  Looking over, one officer then shouted:  <em>"You're not a car.  You have to stay as far right as possible.  If you're making a turn, you have to do it within the block."</em></p>
<p>I only had time to respond with "Oh, yeah…?" and a baffled half-grin before the light changed and they peeled off ahead down Main.  I continued on my way.</p>
<p>This exchange bothered me for several reasons.</p>
<ol>
<li>I don't believe I was doing anything illegal or unsafe.  In fact, I was doing my best to integrate with traffic, as I always do; my movements were well-signed, obvious, and in keeping with regular traffic flow.</li>
<li>I believe that these officers were themselves breaking the law by riding two abreast in one lane of traffic.</li>
<li>If I were committing an infraction, I would have expected (and appreciated) lights or sirens and a proper traffic stop.  Instead, the odd casual nature of this exchange seemed bizarre.</li>
</ol>
<p>I shall do some research into the road regulations to see if I can validate the officer's advice. However I am skeptical that his admonishment, at least in this situation, amounted to little more than personal opinion – which seems rather unprofessional for the police.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2011/04/ad-hoc-cop-talk-or-how-vpd-thinks-i-should-ride-a-bicycle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New airport fondling; no gay military</title>
		<link>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2010/11/new-airport-fondling-no-gay-military/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2010/11/new-airport-fondling-no-gay-military/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kennedy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linkage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.myselfmusic.com/?p=167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two pieces of evidence this week alone that the U.S.A. is still a third-world country ideologically: A federal appalling appeals court blocks the people's right to equitability and indefinitely extends, yet again, the country's ban on gays in the military. The federal transportation "safety" administration has implemented a new rule requiring the molestation (genital fondling) of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two pieces of evidence this week alone that the U.S.A. is still a third-world country ideologically:</p>
<ul>
<li>A federal appalling appeals court blocks the people's right to equitability and <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/11/01/military-gay-ban.html">indefinitely extends, yet again, the country's ban on gays in the military</a>.</li>
<li>The federal transportation "safety" administration has implemented a new rule <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2010/10/for-the-first-time-the-tsa-meets-resistance-updated/65390/">requiring the molestation (genital fondling) of any air traveler not wishing to have nude photographs taken of themselves</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>Unreal. It's interesting to observe that many of the country's irrational hang-ups involve sexual themes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2010/11/new-airport-fondling-no-gay-military/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Rugnetta&#8217;s Little Rights Management Story</title>
		<link>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2010/11/mike-rugnettas-little-rights-management-story/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2010/11/mike-rugnettas-little-rights-management-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kennedy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linkage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.myselfmusic.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's a cautionary tale about ASCAP, the musicians' performing rights union in the States (up here, we have a counterpart called SOCAN). Apparently, they have been actively campaigning against Creative Commons and other similar movements. Mike Rugnetta, a New York musician, disagrees with their politics — but ASCAP refuses to let him quit his membership!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a cautionary tale about <a href="http://www.ascap.com">ASCAP</a>, the musicians' performing rights union in the States (up here, we have a counterpart called <a href="http://www.socan.ca">SOCAN</a>).</p>
<p>Apparently, they have been actively campaigning against <a href="http://creativecommons.ca/">Creative Commons</a> and other similar movements.</p>
<p>Mike Rugnetta, a New York musician, disagrees with their politics — but <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeO6uznzyAE">ASCAP refuses to let him quit his membership!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2010/11/mike-rugnettas-little-rights-management-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Record in H.264 and you can never publish your work?</title>
		<link>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2010/05/record-in-h-264-and-you-can-never-publish-your-work/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2010/05/record-in-h-264-and-you-can-never-publish-your-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 19:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kennedy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linkage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.myselfmusic.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently most all consumer (and even some professional) photo and video cameras embody licensing encumbrances that strive to prevent profitable distribution of your own work: Why Our Civilizations Video Art and Culture is Threatened by the MPEG-LA. Since the posting of that a couple days ago several other analyses (CNET, Engadget) have been presented, including reaction from Lukas [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently most all consumer (and even some professional) photo and video cameras embody licensing encumbrances that strive to prevent profitable distribution of your own work: <a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/23236/Why_Our_Civilization_s_Video_Art_and_Culture_is_Threatened_by_the_MPEG-LA">Why Our Civilizations Video Art and Culture is Threatened by the MPEG-LA</a>.</p>
<p>Since the posting of that a couple days ago several other analyses (<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-30685_3-20000101-264.html">CNET</a>, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/04/know-your-rights-h-264-patent-licensing-and-you/">Engadget</a>) have been presented, including reaction from Lukas Mathis who <a href="ignorethecode.net/blog/2010/05/05/h_264/">concludes that H.264 is not viable</a> for long-term use.</p>
<p>This is sort of a rough situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.myselfmusic.com/2010/05/record-in-h-264-and-you-can-never-publish-your-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

